Important Notice: On February 29th, this community was put into read-only mode. All existing posts will remain but customers are unable to add new posts or comment on existing. Please feel to join our Community Discord for any questions and discussions.

Deploy when new clients pop-up

Hello,

Fist of all I want to say great products. Just started using PDQ Deploy and Inventory and everything is exactly like I wanted to be. Since I just started I have a few questions, and today I will start with number one.

Is there a possibility for a package or multiple packages for that matter to start deploying automatically when a new client is added in the Target area or in the PDQ Inventory collection? Off course I prefer collection, but either way works. The clients are a mixed of domain joined, cross-forest and workgroup, but as long as DNS is in place I don't think it matters to much for PDQ.

So let's say I have a collection with some clients in it. After a while I manually or dynamically add a few more. I want the package(s) to automatically start deploying on these new clients. What I am trying to achieve is more like a baseline deployment.

Thanks in advance,

Adrian

 

1

Comments

4 comments
Date Votes
  • There's a few ways you can do this. We have a collection of computers that are in the OU where new computers get placed (Collection Filter: Computer > ADPath > Contains > OU Name). Then we run a schedule hourly with all the packages new computers need to get. You can find tune a collection a few different ways as well as how aggressive the schedule runs. 

    PDQ also has a blog on integrating with MDT if you want to go that route.
    https://www.pdq.com/blog/mdt-imaging-in-pdq-deploy/#get-started-using-mdt-imaging-in-pdq-deploy

    0
  • We do something similar.  I just have a schedule setup with all the packages and the Target is a specific OU in AD where newly imaged machines are placed.

    0
  • And when the packages get installed you go and manually move those computers to their respective OUs.

    Got it. I thought there was a different process for this.

    Thanks a lot for the help,

    0
  • That's correct.

    0